WSSDA

Daily Legislative Update

by Dan Steele, WSSDA Director of Governmental Relations

For Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Legislators continue to plow through long lists of Floor Calendars in both the House and Senate as they race to adopt opposite house legislation before this Friday’s penultimate cut-off date. All bills (except budget-impacting bills) must be adopted by their opposite house by 5:00 pm Friday, March 5, in order to remain alive. Between March 6 and Sine Die on March 11, legislative action will essentially be limited to budget matters and resolving differences in bills between the two houses.

While many bills continue to be moved, little action has taken place on education-related legislation. Last night, however, the House adopted an amended version of SB 6604. SB 6604 is the bill which, as originally introduced, would  have repealed, suspended or amended a series of K-12 unfunded mandates. The bill, as adopted by the Senate, included language that would have negatively impacted WSSDA’s membership structure. Last week, the House Education Committee amended the bill, stripping all provisions in the bill, except for the repeal of Student Learning Plans. On Tuesday night, the amended, one section long SB 6604 was brought to the House floor and was amended again. Two amendments were adopted. The first amendment restored the requirement for school districts to prepare Student Learning Plans, but only for students in the eighth grade who have not been successful on state assessments or are not on track to graduate. The second amendment added provisions from HB 3039, which would streamline current “Becca” truancy provisions (HB 3039 was adopted by the full House, but died for lack of action in the Senate). SB 6604, if adopted as amended, will make filing truancy petitions for six- and seven-year old children optional, rather than required. Additionally, e-mail communications and telephone conferences would be allowed. The House adopted the amended bill with a vote of 94-3 and now returns to the Senate for its acceptance or rejection of the amendments.

We continue to await the full House’s action on its 2010 Supplemental Operating Budget proposal. It has become clear that SB 6444, the budget proposal adopted by the Senate, will be the vehicle for action. The House intends on striking the current language of SB 6444 and replacing it with language from its proposed budget (HB 2824, as amended by the House Ways & Means Committee). This means there will be one bill moving, somewhat simplifying the negotiations process for House and Senate budget-writers. It is presumed that when the House adopts an amended SB 6444, it will be returned to the Senate, where it will sit until negotiators have reached a compromise. It is also presumed there will be no official Conference Committee appointed to negotiate on the budget because, by rule, Conference Committee meetings are Open Public Meetings. As has happened in the last several years, budget-writers and leadership will probably meet privately to hash out a negotiated compromise and then will simply amend the agreement on top of the bill (in this case SB 6444), rather than going through a formal Conference Committee process.

So, we are pretty confident SB 6444 will be the budget vehicle, but that is the simple stuff. The more complicated predictions are: 1) “when” will the budget move from the House; and 2) “what” will the budget look like when it is adopted?  The House is still having difficulty rounding up the necessary 50 votes for passage and the coalition of Democrats (the so-called “Blue-Green Alliance”) who have threatened to vote against the budget unless cuts to education, health care and other social services are limited do not appear to be backing down. (The Blue-Green Alliance is a group of 14-15 progressive Democrats that have joined forces supporting labor (Blue) and environmental (Green) issues.) The longer it takes for the House to act on a budget, the more amendments keep piling up. Late yesterday, there were almost 40 amendments “on the bar” waiting for action. At last count today, 46 amendments are on deck.

Late-breaking action: Just prior to finalizing this Update, the Senate took action on HB 2913. HB 2913 would authorize innovative inter-district cooperative high school programs. Sponsored by Rep. Kathy Haigh, the bill would allow non-high districts to establish “Innovation Academies” to provide local options to their high school age students. The bill was adopted by the Senate with no dissenting votes. It will now be sent to the governor for her action.

WSSDA Legislative Report Index

WSSDA legislative reports are prepared by WSSDA's Governmental Relations staff team: Dan Steele (360.252.3010) and Sheila Chard (360.252.3011). We welcome your questions and comments. We also encourage school directors to keep in touch with their legislators on a regular basis. If you need contact information, visit the Legislature's District Lookup Tool. WSSDA also provides a number of links to key House and Senate committees.